콘텐츠로 이동

CT-UART-001 Test Result

Go Back to the Pytest TEST All Index


Test summary


Item Value
Description test_uart_timing
Category timing
Environment local
Result PASS
Execution time 0.001 seconds
Execution date 2026-09-02T14:09:30.643997+09:00
Execution ID 20260902_140930_643903


Test configs


Test Item Value
Test ID CT-UART-001
Category timing
Fixture ID FIXTURE-001
Fixture mode mock


FIXTURE-001 Value
Interface UART
Equipment Saleae
Equipment mode mock
Interface mode mock

Test Source


Item Value
Commit 067861db83f5035c0cc67c1ba43c0fb78601af25
Branch main


Measurement


Item Value
expected_baudrate 921600
measured_baudrate 921596.667
error 3.6168981481902543e-06
jitter 0.00021701388888888888


Statistics


Item Value
mean 921596.6666666666
median 921602.5
min 921490.0
max 921690.0
stddev 67.55656066503748


Logs


  • Path:
    test_reports/results/pytest/test_cases/CT-UART-001


Item Value
Test log 20260902_140930_643903_test.log
Test Result 20260902_140930_643903_result.json


Local LLM Analysis


Item Value
Classification info
Confidence 0.95
Analyzer ollama/deepseek-r1:7b
Status enabled


LLM Test Prompt


analyze the test result and provide a detailed report with recommendations for improvement.


Test Result


Item Value
Status PASS
Severity LOW
Warnings 0
Needs Escalation OFF


Test Summary


Item Value
Summary The test for CT-UART-001 has completed successfully with all assertions passing. The measured baudrate is slightly lower than the expected, with a minor discrepancy in jitter, but within acceptable limits. The hardware under test, a Saleae UART, is functioning correctly without any issues.
Failure Analysis The test has passed successfully. No issues were identified during the execution.
Source Review The source code for the test case, test_uart_timing, was reviewed, and no issues were found. The test configuration and fixture setups appear to be correctly implemented.
Warnings None
Recommendations Review and possibly optimize the baudrate measurement logic to further reduce jitter if possible. Consider implementing additional error correction or filtering mechanisms to enhance robustness.