CT-UART-001 Test Result
Go Back to the Pytest TEST All Index
Test summary
| Item |
Value |
| Description |
test_uart_timing |
| Category |
timing |
| Environment |
local |
| Result |
PASS |
| Execution time |
0.001 seconds |
| Execution date |
2026-09-10T10:55:36.508872+09:00 |
| Execution ID |
20260910_105536_508787 |
Test configs
| Test Item |
Value |
| Test ID |
CT-UART-001 |
| Category |
timing |
| Fixture ID |
FIXTURE-001 |
| Fixture mode |
mock |
| FIXTURE-001 |
Value |
| Interface |
UART |
| Equipment |
Saleae |
| Equipment mode |
mock |
| Interface mode |
mock |
Test Source
| Item |
Value |
| Commit |
04b01c672306ebdb4660d95ef7931ecf802579f9 |
| Branch |
main |
Measurement
| Item |
Value |
| expected_baudrate |
921600 |
| measured_baudrate |
921596.667 |
| error |
3.6168981481902543e-06 |
| jitter |
0.00021701388888888888 |
Statistics
| Item |
Value |
| mean |
921596.6666666666 |
| median |
921602.5 |
| min |
921490.0 |
| max |
921690.0 |
| stddev |
67.55656066503748 |
Logs
- Path:
test_reports/results/pytest/test_cases/CT-UART-001
| Item |
Value |
| Test log |
20260910_105536_508787_test.log |
| Test Result |
20260910_105536_508787_result.json |
Local LLM Analysis
| Item |
Value |
| Classification |
Pass |
| Confidence |
0.98 |
| Analyzer |
ollama/deepseek-r1:7b |
| Status |
enabled |
LLM Test Prompt
analyze the test result and provide a detailed report with recommendations for improvement.
Test Result
| Item |
Value |
| Status |
PASS |
| Severity |
LOW |
| Warnings |
0 |
| Needs Escalation |
OFF |
Test Summary
| Item |
Value |
| Summary |
The UART test for CT-UART-001 has passed successfully with minor performance variations. The measured baudrate is extremely close to the expected 921600, differing by only ~3.6e-6 percent. The jitter is also within acceptable limits, indicating stable timing performance. The Saleae hardware under test is functioning as expected without any issues. |
| Failure Analysis |
No failures detected during the test execution. |
| Source Review |
The test source code is not provided, so no source-level analysis is possible. |
| Warnings |
None |
| Recommendations |
1. Continuously monitor the UART interface to ensure consistent performance. 2. Consider implementing feedback mechanisms for real-time adjustments. 3. Perform additional tests under varying conditions to assess robustness. 4. Evaluate the necessity of the optional features in the source code for improvement. |