CT-UART-001 Test Result
Go Back to the Pytest TEST All Index
Test summary
| Item |
Value |
| Description |
test_uart_timing |
| Category |
timing |
| Environment |
local |
| Result |
PASS |
| Execution time |
0.001 seconds |
| Execution date |
2026-09-10T10:56:49.509771+09:00 |
| Execution ID |
20260910_105649_509686 |
Test configs
| Test Item |
Value |
| Test ID |
CT-UART-001 |
| Category |
timing |
| Fixture ID |
FIXTURE-001 |
| Fixture mode |
mock |
| FIXTURE-001 |
Value |
| Interface |
UART |
| Equipment |
Saleae |
| Equipment mode |
mock |
| Interface mode |
mock |
Test Source
| Item |
Value |
| Commit |
04b01c672306ebdb4660d95ef7931ecf802579f9 |
| Branch |
main |
Measurement
| Item |
Value |
| expected_baudrate |
921600 |
| measured_baudrate |
921596.667 |
| error |
3.6168981481902543e-06 |
| jitter |
0.00021701388888888888 |
Statistics
| Item |
Value |
| mean |
921596.6666666666 |
| median |
921602.5 |
| min |
921490.0 |
| max |
921690.0 |
| stddev |
67.55656066503748 |
Logs
- Path:
test_reports/results/pytest/test_cases/CT-UART-001
| Item |
Value |
| Test log |
20260910_105649_509686_test.log |
| Test Result |
20260910_105649_509686_result.json |
Local LLM Analysis
| Item |
Value |
| Classification |
Pass |
| Confidence |
0.95 |
| Analyzer |
ollama/deepseek-r1:7b |
| Status |
enabled |
LLM Test Prompt
analyze the test result and provide a detailed report with recommendations for improvement.
Test Result
| Item |
Value |
| Status |
PASS |
| Severity |
LOW |
| Warnings |
0 |
| Needs Escalation |
OFF |
Test Summary
| Item |
Value |
| Summary |
Test case CT-UART-001 for UART timing was executed successfully, showing a measured_baudrate of 921596.667, which is very close to the expected_baudrate of 921600, indicating minimal timing inaccuracies. The jitter value of 0.000217 indicates negligible timing variations, suggesting the UART interface is functioning stably. The test metrics, including the mean and median of 921596.666 and 921602.5 respectively, further support the consistent performance of the UART module. |
| Failure Analysis |
No failures detected during the test execution. All test metrics indicate optimal performance with minimal variations. |
| Source Review |
The Saleae hardware UART implementation appears to be functioning correctly, as evidenced by the test results and lack of errors or warnings. The equipment modes are set to 'mock', which aligns with the test expectations, ensuring accurate simulation of the UART interface. |
| Warnings |
None |
| Recommendations |
Continue monitoring the UART interface for any potential timing anomalies, especially during high-throughput operations. Regular testing intervals can help maintain the integrity of the communication link. Consider implementing additional error correction mechanisms if the current accuracy levels are insufficient for critical applications. |