CT-USB-001 Test Result
Go Back to the Pytest TEST All Index
Test summary
| Item |
Value |
| Description |
test_usb_bulk_loopback |
| Category |
communication |
| Environment |
local |
| Result |
PASS |
| Execution time |
0.000 seconds |
| Execution date |
2026-08-19T10:29:18.484058+09:00 |
| Execution ID |
20260819_102918_483976 |
Test configs
| Test Item |
Value |
| Test ID |
CT-USB-001 |
| Category |
communication |
| Fixture ID |
FIXTURE-002 |
| Fixture mode |
mock |
| FIXTURE-002 |
Value |
| Interface |
USB |
| Equipment |
Digilent |
| Equipment mode |
mock |
| Interface mode |
mock |
Test Source
| Item |
Value |
| Commit |
7407acd01cc8747db64636b7cce7c06f6bd9de01 |
| Branch |
main |
Measurement
| Item |
Value |
| bytes_transferred |
256 |
| packet_count |
4 |
| max_packet_size |
64 |
| bus_voltage |
5.0 |
| integrity_error |
0.0 |
Statistics
| Item |
Value |
| endpoint |
1 |
| transfer_count |
1 |
Logs
- Path:
test_reports/results/pytest/test_cases/CT-USB-001
| Item |
Value |
| Test log |
20260819_102918_483976_test.log |
| Test Result |
20260819_102918_483976_result.json |
Local LLM Analysis
| Item |
Value |
| Classification |
Pass |
| Confidence |
0.95 |
| Analyzer |
ollama/deepseek-r1:7b |
| Status |
enabled |
LLM Test Prompt
analyze the test result and provide a detailed report with recommendations for improvement.
Test Result
| Item |
Value |
| Status |
PASS |
| Severity |
LOW |
| Warnings |
0 |
| Needs Escalation |
OFF |
Test Summary
| Item |
Value |
| Summary |
The test USB bulk loopback passed successfully with no errors, low packet loss, and minimal latency. |
| Failure Analysis |
No failures detected in the test run. |
| Source Review |
The source code provided shows the latest commit was '7407acd01cc8747db64636b7cce7c06f6bd9de01' and was from 'main' branch. The fixture configurations indicate a 'mock' mode with interfaces and equipment set to 'USB' and 'Digilent' respectively. |
| Warnings |
None |
| Recommendations |
Review the source code for any potential issues related to USB communication, such as buffer overflow or data corruption. Ensure that the test environment accurately reflects the production setup. Consider implementing additional error handling and logging to catch any issues early in the future. |