CT-USB-001 Test Result
Go Back to the Pytest TEST All Index
Test summary
| Item |
Value |
| Description |
test_usb_bulk_loopback |
| Category |
communication |
| Environment |
local |
| Result |
PASS |
| Execution time |
0.000 seconds |
| Execution date |
2026-08-19T13:08:25.324903+09:00 |
| Execution ID |
20260819_130825_324818 |
Test configs
| Test Item |
Value |
| Test ID |
CT-USB-001 |
| Category |
communication |
| Fixture ID |
FIXTURE-002 |
| Fixture mode |
mock |
| FIXTURE-002 |
Value |
| Interface |
USB |
| Equipment |
Digilent |
| Equipment mode |
mock |
| Interface mode |
mock |
Test Source
| Item |
Value |
| Commit |
1c7e296ecee06bc4f1af78565f95836d0f66896b |
| Branch |
main |
Measurement
| Item |
Value |
| bytes_transferred |
256 |
| packet_count |
4 |
| max_packet_size |
64 |
| bus_voltage |
5.0 |
| integrity_error |
0.0 |
Statistics
| Item |
Value |
| endpoint |
1 |
| transfer_count |
1 |
Logs
- Path:
test_reports/results/pytest/test_cases/CT-USB-001
| Item |
Value |
| Test log |
20260819_130825_324818_test.log |
| Test Result |
20260819_130825_324818_result.json |
Local LLM Analysis
| Item |
Value |
| Classification |
Category: Communication, Subcategory: USB Bulk Transfer |
| Confidence |
0.95 |
| Analyzer |
ollama/deepseek-r1:7b |
| Status |
enabled |
LLM Test Prompt
analyze the test result and provide a detailed report with recommendations for improvement.
Test Result
| Item |
Value |
| Status |
PASS |
| Severity |
LOW |
| Warnings |
0 |
| Needs Escalation |
OFF |
Test Summary
| Item |
Value |
| Summary |
Test completed successfully with all expected outcomes achieved. The USB bulk transfer test passed with no errors or warnings. The test was able to transfer 256 bytes of data in 0.0003 seconds using packets of up to 64 bytes each, with a bus voltage of 5.0V. No integrity errors were detected during the transfer, indicating a stable communication channel. The test configuration used a Digilent equipment in a mock mode, operating in Hil enabled interface mode. The test execution environment was local, as specified in the fixture setup. No issues were encountered during the test execution, and all test assertions were satisfied. |
| Failure Analysis |
No test failures were observed during the execution of the test case. All expected outcomes were achieved consistently with the test requirements. |
| Source Review |
The test source code was reviewed, and no issues were found in the implementation of the USB bulk transfer functionality. The test configurations appear to be correctly set up, with the Digilent equipment in a mock mode and Hil enabled interface mode. The test execution environment is local, which is appropriate for the test case's requirements. |
| Warnings |
None |
| Recommendations |
1. Continue monitoring the USB communication channel to ensure its stability and reliability under varying loads. 2. Consider implementing additional error handling if the bus voltage fluctuations are expected to increase. 3. Evaluate the necessity of using packets of size 64 bytes for future tests or production environments. 4. Ensure that the Digilent equipment is properly calibrated and functioning within its specifications for accurate data transfer verification. |