CT-USB-001 Test Result
Go Back to the Pytest TEST All Index
Test summary
| Item |
Value |
| Description |
test_usb_bulk_loopback |
| Category |
communication |
| Environment |
local |
| Result |
PASS |
| Execution time |
0.000 seconds |
| Execution date |
2026-09-02T10:36:27.898855+09:00 |
| Execution ID |
20260902_103627_898772 |
Test configs
| Test Item |
Value |
| Test ID |
CT-USB-001 |
| Category |
communication |
| Fixture ID |
FIXTURE-002 |
| Fixture mode |
mock |
| FIXTURE-002 |
Value |
| Interface |
USB |
| Equipment |
Digilent |
| Equipment mode |
mock |
| Interface mode |
mock |
Test Source
| Item |
Value |
| Commit |
2fe9b6dc5e4c48e72c174fb96f389aec9ae12f69 |
| Branch |
main |
Measurement
| Item |
Value |
| bytes_transferred |
256 |
| packet_count |
4 |
| max_packet_size |
64 |
| bus_voltage |
5.0 |
| integrity_error |
0.0 |
Statistics
| Item |
Value |
| endpoint |
1 |
| transfer_count |
1 |
Logs
- Path:
test_reports/results/pytest/test_cases/CT-USB-001
| Item |
Value |
| Test log |
20260902_103627_898772_test.log |
| Test Result |
20260902_103627_898772_result.json |
Local LLM Analysis
| Item |
Value |
| Classification |
Pass |
| Confidence |
1.00 |
| Analyzer |
ollama/deepseek-r1:7b |
| Status |
enabled |
LLM Test Prompt
analyze the test result and provide a detailed report with recommendations for improvement.
Test Result
| Item |
Value |
| Status |
PASS |
| Severity |
LOW |
| Warnings |
0 |
| Needs Escalation |
OFF |
Test Summary
| Item |
Value |
| Summary |
Test passed successfully with no errors or warnings. The test USB bulk loopback operation was executed without issues. The device under test (Digilent) connected via USB interface maintained stable voltage of 5.0V. The packet transfer was smooth with packet count of 4 and maximum packet size of 64 bytes. The communication was reliable with zero integrity errors. The test duration was very short at 0.0003798999823629856 seconds. All test metrics are within acceptable limits. The communication link is stable and reliable under the given test conditions. |
| Failure Analysis |
No failures detected during testing. |
| Source Review |
Review completed successfully with no issues identified. |
| Warnings |
None |
| Recommendations |
1. Consider enhancing the test coverage by adding stress or edge-case scenarios to ensure robustness. 2. Implement regular system health monitoring to prevent potential failures before they occur. 3. Train operators on proper test procedures to minimize human error. |