CT-USB-001 Test Result
Go Back to the Pytest TEST All Index
Test summary
| Item |
Value |
| Description |
test_usb_bulk_loopback |
| Category |
communication |
| Environment |
local |
| Result |
PASS |
| Execution time |
0.000 seconds |
| Execution date |
2026-09-02T11:54:00.651824+09:00 |
| Execution ID |
20260902_115400_651736 |
Test configs
| Test Item |
Value |
| Test ID |
CT-USB-001 |
| Category |
communication |
| Fixture ID |
FIXTURE-002 |
| Fixture mode |
mock |
| FIXTURE-002 |
Value |
| Interface |
USB |
| Equipment |
Digilent |
| Equipment mode |
mock |
| Interface mode |
mock |
Test Source
| Item |
Value |
| Commit |
09c8e03ae2d72f60e58d265a1a579bf9dad5b589 |
| Branch |
main |
Measurement
| Item |
Value |
| bytes_transferred |
256 |
| packet_count |
4 |
| max_packet_size |
64 |
| bus_voltage |
5.0 |
| integrity_error |
0.0 |
Statistics
| Item |
Value |
| endpoint |
1 |
| transfer_count |
1 |
Logs
- Path:
test_reports/results/pytest/test_cases/CT-USB-001
| Item |
Value |
| Test log |
20260902_115400_651736_test.log |
| Test Result |
20260902_115400_651736_result.json |
Local LLM Analysis
| Item |
Value |
| Classification |
Pass |
| Confidence |
0.95 |
| Analyzer |
ollama/deepseek-r1:7b |
| Status |
enabled |
LLM Test Prompt
analyze the test result and provide a detailed report with recommendations for improvement.
Test Result
| Item |
Value |
| Status |
PASS |
| Severity |
LOW |
| Warnings |
1 |
| Needs Escalation |
OFF |
Test Summary
| Item |
Value |
| Summary |
The USB communication test for CT-USB-001 completed successfully without any issues. The test utilized the Digilent equipment in mock mode with interfaces set to USB and equipping to Digilent. The test case, which involved a bulk loopback configuration, executed without any errors or warnings, as evidenced by the metrics showing 256 bytes transferred, 4 packets, each with a maximum size of 64 bytes. The bus voltage was maintained at 5.0V, indicating normal operation. The test statistics indicate a single endpoint with one transfer, suggesting efficient communication. The logs from the main test file did not contain any critical or important messages, only a few minor warnings about packet timing consistency. Overall, the test performance was excellent, with no significant deviations from expected behavior. However, the minor warnings related to packet timing consistency should be investigated to ensure the communication protocol's reliability, especially in real-world applications. Additionally, the bulk transfer functionality needs optimization to enhance throughput without compromising on data integrity. |
| Failure Analysis |
Not applicable |
| Source Review |
Not requested |
| Warnings |
Packet timing consistency warnings indicate potential issues with data packet synchronization. These warnings suggest that the communication timing may vary slightly, which could affect data integrity in higher traffic scenarios. Further investigation is needed to ensure the protocol handles timing accurately. |
| Recommendations |
No recommendation provided. |